Infosys Co-Founder Kris Gopalakrishnan and Others Booked Under SC/ST Act

Infosys Co-Founder Kris Gopalakrishnan Among 18 Accused Under SC/ST Atrocities Act Over Allegations of Caste-Based Abuse and Wrongful Dismissal in 2014 Case

In a notable legal event, Infosys co-founder Senapathy Kris Gopalakrishnan and 17 others have been charged under the Prevention of SC/ST Atrocities Act. The case has been booked at the Sadashiva Nagar police station on orders from the 71st city civil and sessions court. Accusations include casteist discrimination, insulting, and false complaints, with the complainant seeking justice for actions that happened way back in 2014.

Case Overview and Claims

The case came into being in consequence of a complaint raised by the member of teaching staff of the Centre for Sustainable Technology of Indian Institute of Science (IISc). The complainant belongs to the Bovi tribe and alleged that in the year 2014 he was wrongly framed in one honey trap and that service connected with such case was terminated. He also alleges casteist abuse and intimidation by a section of individuals, including some high-profiled personalities in the academic and corporate world, apart from professional harm.

The case has gained much publicity as the accused persons are all high-profile personalities, from Kris Gopalakrishnan who is perceived to have contributed to Infosys’s success, and Balaram P who is the former director of IISc. The people accused in the FIR include Govindan Rangarajan, Sridhar Warrier, and some others who work with IISc, among other corporate bodies.

Read more: First Fatality Reported in Maharashtra Due to Guillain-Barre Syndrome Amid Outbreak in Pune

Role of the Prevention of SC/ST Atrocities Act

The Prevention of SC/ST (Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes) Atrocities Act is one of the important legal frameworks in India, aiming to protect individuals from caste-based discrimination and violence. Any person or group of people accused of committing offenses under this act of caste-based abuse or threats will face serious legal consequences. In this case, the wrongful dismissal coupled with allegations of caste-based abuse by the complainant have resulted in charges under this Act.

However, the seriousness of the charge reflects the Indian legal system’s commitment to finally ensuring that the rights of the most marginalized communities are protected from caste-based discrimination. The law will try to provide means to victims to apply for relief, such as harassment, oppression, or violence, on grounds of caste or even tribality.

Reactions from the Corporate World

Former corporate leaders also reacted to the case. Mohandas Pai, the former Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of Infosys, expressed concern over the accusations in a post on X (formerly Twitter). Pai emphasized the importance of protecting the rights of individuals in governance positions, stating that innocent people should not be wrongly charged in such matters. He also requested the government to ensure that no one in a position of leadership is unfairly implicated as it may mar their reputation and disrupt their professional careers.

The comments of Pai above reflect the broader implications for both corporate and academic communities. The fact that it involves individuals from some of India’s leading tech companies, for example Infosys, and IISc, a prestigious institution, has made people raise questions about accountability and whether such power could be misused in some hierarchical situations within organizations.

Read more: Uttarakhand Implements Uniform Civil Code (UCC): All You Need to Know

Legal and Social Implications

The case will most likely be a talking point for legal experts, social activists, and academics as the case unfolds. It brings to the fore the ongoing struggle of marginalized communities in India to find protection and justice under the law. The legal process will, no doubt, throw light on the plight of Scheduled Castes and Tribes, especially within highly influential institutions where caste discrimination may exist in more subtle forms.

The outcome of this case may establish a precedent for how such claims are treated in the future, both from the corporate world and in academe. At present, the case continues to evolve, and all parties will have to wait for the judicial process to determine the validity of accusations and to see an appropriate legal response.

We’re now on WhatsApp. Click to join. 

Like this post?
Register at One World News to never miss out on videos, celeb interviews, and best reads.