Walking vs Cycling: Which is More Effective for Weight Loss?

Walking vs Cycling: Which is More Effective for Weight Loss?

When it comes to weight loss, two of the most popular forms of exercise are walking and cycling. Both activities are low-impact, easy to incorporate into your daily routine, and can be done almost anywhere. But which one is more effective for weight loss? The answer depends on several factors, including your current fitness level, weight, and overall health goals.

Walking for Weight Loss: Walking is a great way to get started with exercise, especially if you’re new to physical activity. It’s low-impact, easy on the joints, and can be done at a leisurely pace. Walking can help you burn calories, improve cardiovascular health, and boost mood. A 30-minute brisk walk can burn approximately 150-200 calories, depending on your weight and pace.

Cycling for Weight Loss: Cycling is another excellent option for weight loss. It’s a low-impact activity that can be done indoors or outdoors, and it’s easy on the joints. Cycling can help you burn more calories than walking, especially if you’re cycling at a high intensity. A 30-minute cycling session can burn approximately 400-600 calories, depending on your weight and resistance level.

Which is Better?

While both walking and cycling are effective for weight loss, cycling tends to be more calorie-intensive. However, walking is a more accessible and convenient option for many people. Ultimately, the best exercise for weight loss is the one that you enjoy and can stick to in the long term. If you’re new to exercise, walking may be a better starting point. As you become more comfortable, you can gradually incorporate cycling into your routine. Remember to always consult with a healthcare professional before starting any new exercise program.

We’re now on WhatsApp. Click to join. 

Like this post?
Register at One World News to never miss out on videos, celeb interviews, and best reads.